Thoughts about the Fed’s Balance Sheet

The Federal Reserve meets this week,
but there is, for all practical purposes,
no chance that a rate hike is delivered.
 
Whatever the Fed means by the gradual
pace of normalization of policy, it precludes
rate hikes at two successive meetings.  

Most market participants do not expect a hike at the next meeting in
mid-March either. 
Bloomberg’s calculation suggests a 33% chance while
the CME estimates the market has discounted a 20% chance.   Our own interpolation is closer to the CME than
Bloomberg.  

Some investors may have been disappointed with the sub-2% reading on the
preliminary estimate of Q4 GDP reported last week, but Fed officials may be
comforted by the fact that final domestic sales (GDP excluding net exports and
inventories) accelerated to 2.5% from 2.1%.
  The economy is evolving
along the lines the Fed suggested.  The FOMC statement could also
acknowledge that market-based measures of inflation expectations are rising.
The five-year breakeven is above 2% for
the first time in a couple of years and
has increased more than 20 bp since the mid-December hike.  

A critical uncertainty is over the fiscal policy of the new US
Administration. 
The FOMC’s information set, like that of investors,
has not changed.  The first priorities have been on trade and
immigration.  There was nothing in the December FOMC statement about
fiscal policy, and this absence can persist.  

Given that several regional Fed Presidents have talked about the Fed’s
balance sheet, it is not surprising that there have been several media and bank reports on the topic.

However, there is no reason to expect that the last paragraph of the FOMC
statement (before the summary of voting), where the balance sheet is discussed
to be changed.    The
current policy is to reinvest principal payments from its agency holdings and
rolling over maturing Treasury securities.  It anticipates doing so until
the normalization of the Fed funds rate is “well under
way.”  

The Fed’s leadership does not appear to be an in a particular hurry to reduce the balance sheet.  It
is clear that the first step will be more interest rate increases.  It is
not clear when the normalization process is well under way, but we suspect that
later this year when the Fed funds target
range is above 1% that the next step is possible.  The next step is not
the reduction of the balance sheet through sales of assets, but rather
refraining from recycling principal payments and maturing issues in full. 
Officials will want some control over the process.    There are over
$200 bln of Treasuries in the Fed’s hands that mature this year.  Next
year’s maturities are more than twice as large.  We also know that in the
long-run the Fed prefer to have only Treasuries on its balance
sheet.  

Bernanke’s blog
post
from last week plays down the urgency that some have expressed.
 
In addition to the gradual, passive approach when the Fed funds are further
away from zero (lower bound), Bernanke suggested that officials figure out the
desired size of the balance sheet in the long-term before starting the
unwinding process.  This will help
manage expectations.  Bernanke offers several arguments why the optimal
size of the Fed’s balance sheet post-crisis is larger than before the
crisis.  

Some of President Trump’s economic advisors have expressed concerns over
the size of the balance sheet, but at the same time, it seems clear that the
Fed’s independence will not encroach.
 
There is not a reason to challenge the
independence of the central bank.  With some conservative assumptions, it
appears that over the next 18 months or so, the President will have the opportunity to alter the configuration of the
Federal Reserve through appointments.   Two of the seven seats on the
Board of Governors are vacant.  Yellen and Fischer’s terms as Chair and
Vice-Chair end next year.  

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email