Where Do US Companies Hire Abroad?

The US economy created roughly nine million net new jobs since the start of 2009.  Through organic growth and acquisition,
majority-owned affiliates of US multinational companies have also expanded
their employment outside the US.  

It is
interesting to see where US companies hire foreign workers.
 The Bureau of Labor Statistics tracks
this, but the most recent data is only through 2014.  
Of the nine
million net new jobs in created in the US
since 2009, a little more than half (4.82 mln)
were created between 2009 and the end of
this period, the majority owned affiliates of US companies increased their
payrolls by roughly three million to 13.8 mln.  
The situation
is considerably more complicated that simply pursuing lower wages, which seems
to be the conventional understanding on both the political right and left. 
 High wage economies in the EU, Canada, Japan and Australia, account for almost half of the
overseas employment (6.4 mln).  US affiliates
are employed about 2.5 mln people in the UK, Germany, and France, alone, and nearly 1.2 mln in Canada.  
Moreover, in
regions that ostensibly have lower labor costs, like Central America, US
companies concentrate in the relatively higher wage areas.
  For example, of the approximately,
1.5 million employees of US affiliates in Central America, Mexico accounts for
almost 1.3 mln, leaving the lower wage Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa
Rica and Panama, to divide up the remaining 200k jobs.   
The same is
true of Africa, where US affiliates hired less than 250k employees, with more
than 40% accounted for by South Africa.
  US companies employed 31.2k in Egypt
and 10.5k in Nigeria.  That means that in rest of the continent, another
100k people work for majority-owned affiliates of US companies.    Of
the 136k employees of US companies in the
Middle East, the relatively high wage Israel accounts for over half.  
In 2014, US
majority-owned affiliates employed 1.67 mln people in China and 1.12 mln in India. 
There may be a wage inducement in these
countries, though, by most measures,
India has lower wages than China.  However, India may also be less engaged
in low-wage manufacturing and more
involved in business services, like accounting, research, phone centers, and customer support activities.
US companies
want to be close to their customers.
  Big economies have an advantage.
 China is the world’s second-largest
economy, though according to some purchasing power parity measures, it is
larger than the US.  Similarly, India, which is the seventh largest
economy in nominal terms may be the third largest using some PPP measures.
While these are
the “stock” of foreign employees at majority owned affiliates, we are
also interested in the “flow” or the change over the 2009 to 2014
 Modest changes were seen in Canada, Japan, and Europe.
 US affiliates hired 104k more Canadians (9.6%), 28.6k Japanese (9.2%) and
410k European (9.9%).  Of these new jobs in Europe, the UK accounted for
146k, which is a 35% increase in British employment at US companies over this
period.  Note that US affiliates hired fewer people in 2014 in Belgium, Finland, France and Spain, than in 2009. 
working for US affiliates increased by 177k, which is a 34% increase. 
 An additional 322k Mexicans are employed as US majority-owned affiliates, which is about a 32%
increase.  African employment by US companies increases by 46.4% or 75.6k people.  South Africa accounted
fro the majority (48.5k) which is nearly an 84% increase.  
Employment at
majority-owned US affiliates in the Asia-Pacific region rose by almost 1.8 mln
people in the 2009-2014 period. 
represents a 56% increase.  Almost three-quarters
of this increase are accounted for by
China and India.  US employment in China increases
by 730k people or 77.6%.  US employment in India increases by almost 600k people or 115%.  
We will address
in future notes why the US has pursued a direct investment strategy rather than
the traditional export approach.
  Suffice it is here to simply note
that the employment by the majority-owned affiliates of US companies abroad
cannot be simply explained by the pursuit
of low wages.  

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email