Trade Tensions with China Set to Escalate

The two main legislative initiatives in
the US this year, the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and the tax changes,
are not particularly popular. 
 However, the next items on
the agenda appear to enjoy broader support.  The infrastructure initiative
is likely to be unveiled as early as next month.  Before that, the US is poised to ratchet up the
tension on China.  
Despite the unilateral
thrust of the Trump Administration, in its confrontation with China, it has
been wise to coordinate efforts with the EU and Japan.
  Last week, the three issued a joint
statement, a thinly veiled criticism of China for its policies and funding that
led to excess capacity in numerous sectors.  They agreed to target market-distorting subsidies.  
The US recently formally
supported the EU in a WTO case whose crux was whether China should be classified as a market economy.
  The US, EU, and Japan say no. 
If China were to be declared a market economy,
it would be more difficult for countries to resist unfair trade practices, like
dumping (selling a good cheaper in a foreign market than in the domestic
market).  The US, Japan, and the EU
protest a range of China’s policies, from market-distorting subsidies to forces
technology transfers and infringement of intellectual property
One way that China projects
its power is by co-opting local elites with lucrative sinecures and consultancy
 Consider the recent news that former UK Prime Minister Cameron has taken
a post with head up a GBP750 mln fund that is to help finance China’s One Belt
One Road initiative.  The fund is supported by the UK government though no
taxpayers’ money will be invested.  
In 2015, when Cameron was
Prime Minister a Shanghai-London stock connect initiative was announced.
  It has yet to be implemented.  A bond-connect type of
facility has been announced more recently, though it too may not be implemented
quickly.  Recall Cameron also led the UK to break what up until that time
was unified front by Europe, the US, Japan, and others not to participate in
China-sponsored Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank.  
President Trump is expected
to unveil his national security strategy on Monday.
  Press reports indicate that it will
accuse China of “economic aggression.”  The document will
reportedly upgrade China from a competitor on every element and dimension of
power to a threat.   The broad thrust of getting tougher on China
will enjoy bipartisan support,  
Still, one might think reasonable
wonder if the bark is not worse than the
  As a candidate, Trump promised to cite China as a
currency manipulator.  He hasn’t.  Trump promised to slap 25% tariff
on imports from China.  He hasn’t.  The Administration talked tough
on sanctioning Chinese banks who facilitate trade with North Korea.  Only
one bank has been cited, and it is was
one of the country’s smallest banks.  
The administration launched
investigations on national security grounds into steel and aluminum imports.
  Nothing has come from these, and a
new charge on intellectual property rights has been
made.   Many countries, including the US, have become more
selective of direct investment by Chinese companies, especially from those that
are state-owned.  Australia’s Prime Minister Turnbull crackdown on China’s
interference with its domestic politics has led to a Labour Senator’s
resignation over links to a Chinese billionaire connected
to the Chinese Communist Party.  
Even through the summer, it appeared US Administration officials were kept in check by the President’s need for
China’s cooperation in dealing with the threat posed by North Korea. 
has stepped up pressure on North Korea and has voted in favor of US initiatives
in the UN Security Council.   However, China has stopped short
committing itself to measures that have not be sanctioned by the UN, and Trump
officials seem to believe China could do more but is unwilling.
The Trump Administration
pays little notice to the fact that this year through October, China bought
$130 bln of US Treasuries (bills, notes, and
.  It sold
almost $190 bln of Treasuries in 2016.  Instead, the fact that the US
calculates that this year’s bilateral trade deficit with China is set to grow
over last year’s $347 bln has been a thorn in its side. Through October, the
bilateral deficit stood at $310 bln.  

The US tax bill provides an opening for China.  Chinese and European officials have
expressed concerns about some features of the proposed tax reform.  Some
features may not stand up to WTO scrutiny.   Other features, like the
tax treatment of intrafirm loans, may put some subsidiaries of foreign
companies, including financial firms, as a distinct disadvantage.  


Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email