Edit
As widely expected, the UK Supreme Court
ruled that Parliament approval is needed to trigger Article 50 start the
divorce proceedings with the EU. The Court decided by an 8-3
majority that a bill needs to be submitted
to both chambers, but that the approval
of the regional assemblies (e.g. Scotland, Northern Ireland) is not necessary.
ruled that Parliament approval is needed to trigger Article 50 start the
divorce proceedings with the EU. The Court decided by an 8-3
majority that a bill needs to be submitted
to both chambers, but that the approval
of the regional assemblies (e.g. Scotland, Northern Ireland) is not necessary.
A bill is more
onerous than a motion in that not only are both chambers involved, but
amendments can be added that further
condition. This appears
to be Labour’s strategy; not to oppose the triggering of Brexit, but ensure a
larger role for parliament to ensure it is integral in the process. Two
elements that could work in favor of the
government is the fact that it was not a unanimous decision and that the
regional assemblies have not a role.
The former had been anticipated,
though some reports suggested a 7-4 decision. The latter had greater
potential to disrupt May’s timetable given the recent collapse of the Northern
Irish assembly.
onerous than a motion in that not only are both chambers involved, but
amendments can be added that further
condition. This appears
to be Labour’s strategy; not to oppose the triggering of Brexit, but ensure a
larger role for parliament to ensure it is integral in the process. Two
elements that could work in favor of the
government is the fact that it was not a unanimous decision and that the
regional assemblies have not a role.
The former had been anticipated,
though some reports suggested a 7-4 decision. The latter had greater
potential to disrupt May’s timetable given the recent collapse of the Northern
Irish assembly.
The issue now becomes parliamentary in nature in the sense
that the government will craft a bill to minimize the scope for amendments, and
which amendments are discussed and for
how long. The Tories have a small majority in
the House of Commons, and the challenge will be for an amendment to find
sufficient support. Initially, at least,
the Supreme Court ruling ought not to push back May’s end of a Q1 target for triggering Article 50.
that the government will craft a bill to minimize the scope for amendments, and
which amendments are discussed and for
how long. The Tories have a small majority in
the House of Commons, and the challenge will be for an amendment to find
sufficient support. Initially, at least,
the Supreme Court ruling ought not to push back May’s end of a Q1 target for triggering Article 50.
Sterling fell
from a little above $1.2500 to a little below $1.2440 on the news and recovered
quickly. The low met the 38.2% retracement
objective of the rally from the pre-weekend low, leaving our constructive outlook intact. Recall yesterday that sterling rallied from around $1.2380 to almost $1.2540. Important chart support is seen in the $1.2400-$1.2415 area, and a break of it would undermine our
outlook.
from a little above $1.2500 to a little below $1.2440 on the news and recovered
quickly. The low met the 38.2% retracement
objective of the rally from the pre-weekend low, leaving our constructive outlook intact. Recall yesterday that sterling rallied from around $1.2380 to almost $1.2540. Important chart support is seen in the $1.2400-$1.2415 area, and a break of it would undermine our
outlook.
Turning to the
eurozone, the flash January PMI was reported. The composite reading of 54.3, down
ever so slightly from the 54.4 December reading is consistent with continued
steady growth. Two details, in particular,
were notable. Employment is at its best level in nine years, and forward-looking new orders also
rose. Also, there were some signs of pricing power from
suppliers, which likely reflects the rise in commodity prices. Import prices may also have been lifted by the euro’s
depreciation.
eurozone, the flash January PMI was reported. The composite reading of 54.3, down
ever so slightly from the 54.4 December reading is consistent with continued
steady growth. Two details, in particular,
were notable. Employment is at its best level in nine years, and forward-looking new orders also
rose. Also, there were some signs of pricing power from
suppliers, which likely reflects the rise in commodity prices. Import prices may also have been lifted by the euro’s
depreciation.
Although it
will do little to change the dialogue ahead of the April election, France’s
composite reading of 53.8 is the highest in this short time series (three-years-old). Consider that last January the composite was at 50.2, and
in June it was at 49.6. The gains came from services not manufacturing.
By contrast, the German composite slipped to 54.7 from 55.2.
Services were a drag, falling to 53.2 from 54.3. Manufacturing, on
the other hand, rose to 56.5 from 55.6, matching its record high set in January
2014. We would not want to make a big deal of the decline in German
composite reading. The average from Q4 16 was 55.1 and Q3 53.8. The
12-month average is 54.3.
will do little to change the dialogue ahead of the April election, France’s
composite reading of 53.8 is the highest in this short time series (three-years-old). Consider that last January the composite was at 50.2, and
in June it was at 49.6. The gains came from services not manufacturing.
By contrast, the German composite slipped to 54.7 from 55.2.
Services were a drag, falling to 53.2 from 54.3. Manufacturing, on
the other hand, rose to 56.5 from 55.6, matching its record high set in January
2014. We would not want to make a big deal of the decline in German
composite reading. The average from Q4 16 was 55.1 and Q3 53.8. The
12-month average is 54.3.
Japan’s
preliminary manufacturing PMI was also reported. It rose to a three-year high of 52.8
(from 52.4). It bottomed last May near 47.7. The average from Q4 16
was 51.7 and Q3 49.7. This is
consistent with our anticipation that the Japanese economy has some positive
momentum to start the year. The dollar’s recent losses were extended
marginally against the yen in Asia before it recovered. Yesterday’s low was
about JPY112.70 and last week’s low was JPY112.60. In Asia, the dollar was sold to nearly JPY112.50. Near-term
potential extends to JPY113.50, while a move above JPY113.70-JPY114.00 may be
an early indication that a low may be in place.
preliminary manufacturing PMI was also reported. It rose to a three-year high of 52.8
(from 52.4). It bottomed last May near 47.7. The average from Q4 16
was 51.7 and Q3 49.7. This is
consistent with our anticipation that the Japanese economy has some positive
momentum to start the year. The dollar’s recent losses were extended
marginally against the yen in Asia before it recovered. Yesterday’s low was
about JPY112.70 and last week’s low was JPY112.60. In Asia, the dollar was sold to nearly JPY112.50. Near-term
potential extends to JPY113.50, while a move above JPY113.70-JPY114.00 may be
an early indication that a low may be in place.
The euro also
made a marginal new multi-week high
(~$1.0772) before hitting a wall of offers that sent it back to $1.0735. Trading is choppy,
and ranges are narrow. Although we still read the technical indicators as
suggesting that the euro’s upside correction may be in its last stages, the
underlying tone still is firm. A break of the $1.0700 area and, ideally,
the $1.0660-$1.0680 area is needed to boost the chances that a high is in
place.
made a marginal new multi-week high
(~$1.0772) before hitting a wall of offers that sent it back to $1.0735. Trading is choppy,
and ranges are narrow. Although we still read the technical indicators as
suggesting that the euro’s upside correction may be in its last stages, the
underlying tone still is firm. A break of the $1.0700 area and, ideally,
the $1.0660-$1.0680 area is needed to boost the chances that a high is in
place.
Helping the
dollar today is the recovery in US yields. Recall that last week; the 10-year yield fell to 2.30% before
poking through 2.50% before the weekend. It fell to 2.40% yesterday and
now is up a few basis points today. Investors are still waiting for more
details about the infrastructure spending, deregulation, and tax cuts.
Yesterday’s executive orders, including the federal hiring freeze and the
prohibition of US funds being used by
foreign organizations that facilitate abortions,
are traditional Republican positions.
dollar today is the recovery in US yields. Recall that last week; the 10-year yield fell to 2.30% before
poking through 2.50% before the weekend. It fell to 2.40% yesterday and
now is up a few basis points today. Investors are still waiting for more
details about the infrastructure spending, deregulation, and tax cuts.
Yesterday’s executive orders, including the federal hiring freeze and the
prohibition of US funds being used by
foreign organizations that facilitate abortions,
are traditional Republican positions.
The freeze on
what was called run-away federal hiring may be less than meets the eye. While there was a small increase in
federal hiring over the past few years, in the larger picture that is not where
the government has grown. Indeed, the federal government directly hires
about 2.7 mln employees. This is roughly the same as 50 years ago. The real growth of the government’s
workforce is on the state and local
level. In 1966, there were about 7.8 mln Americans working for state and
local governments. Now there are roughly 19.5 mln.
what was called run-away federal hiring may be less than meets the eye. While there was a small increase in
federal hiring over the past few years, in the larger picture that is not where
the government has grown. Indeed, the federal government directly hires
about 2.7 mln employees. This is roughly the same as 50 years ago. The real growth of the government’s
workforce is on the state and local
level. In 1966, there were about 7.8 mln Americans working for state and
local governments. Now there are roughly 19.5 mln.
The formal
withdrawal from TPP was well-telegraphed. The effort to renegotiate NAFTA was
not a surprise. Note that Obama wanted to renegotiate NAFTA and thought
that by including Mexico and Canada into the TPP, it would accomplish the
objective of modernizing the agreement.
withdrawal from TPP was well-telegraphed. The effort to renegotiate NAFTA was
not a surprise. Note that Obama wanted to renegotiate NAFTA and thought
that by including Mexico and Canada into the TPP, it would accomplish the
objective of modernizing the agreement.
UK Supreme Court Requires May to Submit Bill on Brexit to Westminster Parliament
Reviewed by Marc Chandler
on
January 24, 2017
Rating: